- News
- UK
- UK Politics
Donald Trump’s interviews have revealed that his close relationship with Keir Starmer is finished, political editor David Maddox explains that the breakdown is much more than a disagreement over Iran
Wednesday 04 March 2026 04:25 GMT- Bookmark
- CommentsGo to comments
Bookmark popover
Removed from bookmarks
Close popoverTrump hits out at Starmer: 'This is not Winston Churchill we're dealing with'
Sign up to our free Brexit newsletter for our analysis of the continuing impact of Brexit on the UK
Sign up to our free newsletter for the latest analysis on Brexit's impact
Sign up to our free newsletter for the latest analysis on Brexit's impact
Email*SIGN UPI would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice
It wasn’t long ago that Sir Keir Starmer was being hailed on the international stage for his skill as a “Trump whisperer”.
The prime minister was the envy of his international allies for his ability to, against the odds, develop a strong relationship with the famously volatile US president.
But the interviews that the US president has given in the last 48 hours to the Daily Telegraph and The Sun, in which he criticised Sir Keir’s refusal to allow attacks on Iran to be launched from RAF bases, and the UK’s decision not to join the raids, surely mark the end of the relationship.
The killer line was the president’s almost wistful reflection that the relationship was “not what it was” – with more than a hint that any damage may be irreparable.
Words like “disappointing” and “far too late” (in regards to allowing the US to use RAF bases) suggest a certain regret in Trump’s tone rather than his usual bombastic attack style.
open image in gallerySir Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump’s relationship has broken down, with the prime minister no longer considered the Trump whisperer (PA)Nevertheless it appears to be over. Sir Keir is no longer the Trump whisperer, he is consigned to a list of world leaders who regularly receive the ire of the current occupant of the Oval Office.
And the biggest loser in all this is the UK in terms of trade and influence.
President Trump had been willing to put aside ideological differences with Starmer, partly because he respected him as a politician, but largely because of his love for the country of his Scottish mother’s birth and its royal family.
Much was achieved diplomatically early on because of Trump’s desire to ensure his state visit was a huge success and part of his legacy.
The strategy had been that King Charles’ planned visit to the US for the 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence would help Starmer persuade the president to be more amenable on issues like handing over Chagos to the Mauritians, being reasonable in respects to Ukraine and the Middle East, and not imposing trade tariffs on Britain along with the rest of the world.
But already issues like handing over the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, Starmer’s refusal to support Trump’s claims on Greenland and the US trade tariffs had poisoned what had been a very positive relationship.
In fact, Trump has told allies that he was “lied to” about the Chagos deal and now sees it as a threat to US security.
It seems that the UK is not going to escape the reworked tariffs and that carefully negotiated first trade deal is looking more like it is not worth the paper it is written on with each passing day.
open image in galleryHappier times with Trump holding a UK-US trade deal with Sir Keir while speaking to the media at the G7 summit in Canada in June 2025 (PA Archive)The decision to ignore, and then deplore Starmer, over attacking Iran is perhaps most symbolic of the way the prime minister’s restraining influence has now evaporated.
The reason for the collapse in the relationship is complex though. It partly relates to the ongoing anger over the mistake made by the PM of appointing Peter Mandelson as ambassador to the US against the wishes of the Trump White House. Having a man who was seen as a friend of both Jeffrey Epstein and China in Washington has not gone down well.
It also relates to the collapse in Sir Keir’s own popularity and authority domestically. The Trump administration had put aside its support for Nigel Farage to a certain extent in the early days, but they are as aware as anyone that Starmer’s days as PM appear to be numbered.
The issues about free speech have become incredibly corrosive too. Just last month, the far right activist Tommy Robinson was welcomed to the State Department as a “freedom fighter” in what illustrates a growing trend. This followed Trump allies in the UK feeding his administration names of people to deny visas to and sanction in regards to being alleged “enemies of free speech”.
It is now clear that massaging the ego of the quixotic Trump only goes so far. So while Sir Keir has acted reasonably throughout, that has gone down badly in the White House.
The disagreement over Trump’s claim to Greenland may have been seen as the beginning of the end but the truth is that the relationship had already hit the rocks.
The problem for the prime minister though is that without his ability to deal with this president he loses the one thing that had made his premiership a success. He is no longer the bridge between Trump and other western allies, just another floundering international leader on the White House’s naughty list.
But unless he wants to become the puppet to the whims of Trump, like Farage is, then there seems to be no way back for Sir Keir.
The one hope is that the visit by the King on 4 July can still provide a healing moment. By then though it may be that a different prime minister is looking to build a relationship with the president.
More about
Keir StarmerDonald TrumpSpecial RelationshipIranJoin our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments